National Security Leaks and Constitutional Duty
Kasner*, Alexander J.
Stanford Law Review (2015): 241-283
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24247333
* Winner of Scribes Law-Review Award
“In 2013, Edward Snowden leaked thousands of National Security Agency (NSA) documents to the press and public, detailing practices that he believed violated the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the Constitution. In response, the U.S. government charged him with multiple espionage-related violations, including theft of government property, unauthorized communication of national defense information, and willful communication of classified communications intelligence information to an unauthorized person. Faced with the prospect of a long imprisonment, Snowden fled the country and is now in exile. Snowden’s ideas about the Constitution are not altogether unreasonable: many judges, academics, and policymakers have questioned the constitutionality of NSA surveillance programs, and the dialogue over the Constitution’s treatment of privacy is at a fever pitch. And yet, despite some fervent calls for a presidential grant of clemency, it appears that Snowden will have no legal defense—statutory or constitutional—for his actions. ”
Similar Papers
Sunstein, Cass
Columbia Law Review 96 (1996): 903
https://doi.org/10.2307/1123430
Waldron, Jeremy
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13, no. 1 (1993): 18-51
https://www.jstor.org/stable/764646
Sunstein, Cass
University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144, no. 5 (1996): 2021-2053
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3312647
Allison, John R., and Mark A. Lemley
AIPLA QJ 26 (1998): 185
Webb, Laura A.
Journal of Legal Education 67, no. 1 (2017): 315-337
Barr, Allen C.
Minnesota Law Review 101 (2016): 301
Kasner, Alexander J.
Stanford Law Review (2015): 241-283
Burk, Dan L., and Mark A. Lemley
Virginia Law Review (2003): 1575-1696
Koskenniemi, Martti
The Modern Law Review 70, no. 1 (2007): 1-30
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00624.x