Why Legal Writers Should Think Like Teachers
Webb*, Laura A.
Journal of Legal Education 67, no. 1 (2017): 315-337
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26453546
* Professor at University of Richmond
“Professors, whether doctrinal-, clinical-, or skills-focused, are frequently asked to provide writing advice to students and recent graduates. And we do, doling out both specific edits and general advice: Create clearer structure! Write short sentences! Provide road maps!
But did you ever wonder why these tips lead to better writing, or how to help your students remember and understand why they should use them? Here’s what I tell my students: Legal writing is fundamentally educative. To be a better writer, you must be a better teacher. To be a better teacher, you must understand the cognitive science behind how your reader learns: how the brain absorbs, accesses, and analyzes information. Then, you can use that science to guide your writing: Teach your reader. This approach helps students see why writing advice makes sense and remember how to follow it.
”
Similar Papers
Sunstein, Cass
Columbia Law Review 96 (1996): 903
https://doi.org/10.2307/1123430
Waldron, Jeremy
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13, no. 1 (1993): 18-51
https://www.jstor.org/stable/764646
Sunstein, Cass
University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144, no. 5 (1996): 2021-2053
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3312647
Allison, John R., and Mark A. Lemley
AIPLA QJ 26 (1998): 185
Webb, Laura A.
Journal of Legal Education 67, no. 1 (2017): 315-337
Barr, Allen C.
Minnesota Law Review 101 (2016): 301
Kasner, Alexander J.
Stanford Law Review (2015): 241-283
Burk, Dan L., and Mark A. Lemley
Virginia Law Review (2003): 1575-1696
Koskenniemi, Martti
The Modern Law Review 70, no. 1 (2007): 1-30
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00624.x